11 comments

  • feverzsj 1 hour ago
    > Starting in August 2027, they will be allowed to 'hold a student, keep them in place, or take them to another room' if the student disrupts the class.

    Far from what I imagined as 'physical force'.

    • d1sxeyes 1 hour ago
      Yeah. The UK for example already allows use of 'reasonable force' to prevent a pupil from committing a criminal offense, prevent personal injury or damage to property, and most ambiguously, to 'maintain good order and discipline in the classroom', which sounds a lot like this.

      This headline implies misleadingly that teachers in Denmark are reintroducing the cane or something.

      • ifwinterco 47 minutes ago
        In reality though you can easily lose your job in the UK over stuff like this if a kid/parent complains so teachers are afraid to use any force at all.

        What the law says on paper is one thing, who the school administration will believe and back up is another

        • inSumErgoCogito 31 minutes ago
          Just imagine how hard the culture clash would be though, if a female teacher slapped a student from a culture where males are basically unchecked from youth. This is a constant source of escalation for israeli checkpoint guards..
          • pyrale 1 minute ago
            It was a really fast jump from discussing how to handle unruly students in class to explaining the "struggles" of this specific country.
      • password54321 35 minutes ago
        Even as much as a nudge can be escalated to safeguarding, which can lead to an investigation where people can say anything about you, which can lead you to getting sacked if they found a 'safeguarding breach', which can lead to a TRA panel (they get over a 1000 referrals per year), which can lead to a suspension and ends you up on the public government website with your full name (your life is ruined).

        Notice none of the steps need to even amount to a legal assault. Just what your school and the Dfe thinks goes against "safeguarding" which is broad. God forbid if you are a man.

    • ketzu 1 hour ago
      Primed by discussions of Americans on corporal punishment of children, I expected much much worse.
    • bigstrat2003 1 hour ago
      Yeah, using "physical force" in the headline feels extremely dishonest on the part of the publication.
  • red_admiral 7 minutes ago
    What the article actually says: the threshold for "force" rises from "student is actively endangering someone" to "student is being disruptive" (throwing food around the classroom is given as an example).

    There is no mention of force as a punishment (such as spanking), and force means things like holding a student's hand firmly to stop them throwing food. It's not whacking them with a nightstick.

  • yturijea 38 minutes ago
    From Denmark. between 99 and 02 then I was 7-10 it was not uncommon for certain trouble makers to be placed in rooms, or in a broom closet or similar, until the class was up.

    And there certainly was elements of "holding students" for my entire period of elementary school, as certain groups of kids are just insane hurting each other.

    But glad for the teachers they get tools to control a situation as police is not likely to be available to come to every school all the time. and hope the teachers are not getting hurt in the process, as some kids can be quite violent.

    Generally teachers have suffered from increased scrutiny from all directions in Denmark for the last 8 years, which have caused a lot of people to leave the career and choose another career. This, same as rest of the world I imagine has mostly been due to the parents not taking responsibility of their kids, and the kids have been uncontrollable and the parents have always taken the kids side in any argument where a kid was not succeeding in school. Which in the 90's and 00's was much less frequent.

    • InsideOutSanta 4 minutes ago
      The broom closet seems a bit creepy as a punishment. But my primary school teachers in the 80s used to lock me in the school library as "punishment", which turned out to be the wrong incentive.
    • rusk 20 minutes ago
      > not uncommon for certain trouble makers to be placed in rooms, or in a broom closet

      That is shocking to me and I went to school in the 80s. Sounds like there was good cause but the pendulum swung too far. Now it’s coming back and things are settling.

      It’s funny because you normally think of the Nordics as being so far ahead in things like this but I guess we all have our blind spots.

  • Pinegulf 45 minutes ago
    Sometimes only words don't work. That's why we have police, guards and armies.

    The guiding idea should be "minimum necessary force used". Sometimes the this includes physical force.

  • t0duf0du 49 minutes ago
    Dude in India, it was fairly common for teachers to whoop asses. There were some teachers (the good ones) whose punishment included doing squats or running around the field but there were some monsters who would horribly hit students, me in the 9th grade was beaten so bad that it started from the first row of bench and ended at the end of the last bench, the fucking monster did not even stop after me being cornered.
    • justforfunhere 25 minutes ago
      As a fellow Indian growing up in 90s, I feel you. I had my fair share of beatings from teachers in school.

      There were cases where parents who found it challenging to control their kids, would encourage teachers to use physical force on them. Parents deemed it was school's responsibility to instill discipline in their children.

      As far as I can recall, use of violence to control kids was pretty common back in the day, both at home and at school. I don't see that happening nowadays, though.

    • watt 33 minutes ago
      Famously, the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein beat a pupil unconscious https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haidbauer_incident
      • satisfice 22 minutes ago
        Ludwig Hittgenstein, they used to call him. (But only in their private language.)
  • tjmc 23 minutes ago
    From someone who's watched Robocop a few too many times, that's a disturbing headline.
  • terespuwash 25 minutes ago
    If a kid isn't dangerous the answer is support not physical force.
    • rusk 17 minutes ago
      If a child’s actions are ultimately going to get them hurt in life restraint is support.
  • christkv 1 hour ago
    I never had a problem with students having rights. I have a problem with those rights not coming with responsibilities and proper sanctions when those are violated. There should be zero tolerance of students using violence either against the teachers or other students. They should be moved to a reform school immediately.
    • joha4270 54 minutes ago
      Alas, those classes was wound down a decade ago to save money, that is I mean be more inclusive.
  • silicon3383 27 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • swedishPerson1 47 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • Mashimo 1 hour ago
    [flagged]
    • salviati 1 hour ago
      No, I don't know what I mean. And I don't think you understand what TFA is talking about:

      > Since 1967, teachers could only physically intervene with students if their safety or that of others was at risk. Starting in August 2027, they will be allowed to 'hold a student, keep them in place, or take them to another room' if the student disrupts the class.