Texas city demands $2M for public records on Flock usage

(arstechnica.com)

58 points | by 01-_- 2 hours ago

5 comments

  • chaps 47 minutes ago
    Been there with a 33M cost estimate [1]. If the requester is reading this -- hold them to it and request a much smaller but still significant amount of records. Use that as the foundation for "how much time it actually takes". Another option is to get clever with helping them with means and modes of review/redaction. This is how I got the email metadata for 6M emails from Houston for example.

    Another example from Vermont's governor's office: https://www.muckrock.com/foi/vermont-80/email-metadata-55744...

    Happy to help more but I'll probably be unavailable tonight.

    [1] https://mchap.io/that-time-the-city-of-seattle-accidentally-...

    • lelandfe 37 minutes ago
      [1] was a lot crazier than I was expecting and I read the whole thing. I’m glad you didn’t have to face any serious repercussions.
    • jacquesm 46 minutes ago
      Great work, keep at it!
  • therealdrag0 34 minutes ago
    FOIA requests that have to be redacted are labor intensive. However, flock shouldn’t need to be redacted right? They’re just public webcams. Lots of those already exist and many stream live.
  • nilamo 46 minutes ago
    If the data is so difficult to get, that it's unreasonable to get, just get rid of flock then. You're already not getting any benefit.

    Unless... no, that couldn't have been a lie, could it? The government would never try to overcharge anyone, right?

  • AngryData 58 minutes ago
    All digital government records should already be freely distributed. This is basically the same thing as poll extortion tax. You want to use your rights? Then pay up! Oh you didn't go away yet? Pay up even more!