6 comments

  • collinfunk 39 minutes ago
    I really don't understand why Canonical rushes this. If 'rm' can't remove all possible directory entries, that is a big issue:

      $ podman run --rm -it ubuntu:26.10
      $ apt update -y; apt upgrade -y
      $ rm --version
      rm (uutils coreutils) 0.10.0
      $ gnumkdir -p $(yes a/ | head -n $((32 * 1024)) | tr -d '\n')
      $ rm -rf a
      Segmentation fault (core dumped) rm -rf a
      $ ls a
      a
      $ gnurm -rf a
      $ ls a
      ls: cannot access 'a': No such file or directory
    • teekert 38 minutes ago
      Rush? This is an interim release (95% or so only tracks LTS's) that is not even out yet... Go file a bug reports if you have some time.
      • collinfunk 32 minutes ago
        I have. It has been an open bug upstream for years as well.
        • teekert 22 minutes ago
          ok, that's concerning, if you post it here I'll vote for it (after confirming).
    • amelius 17 minutes ago
      Let them first fix Snap.
    • dark-star 15 minutes ago
      yeah, this is a bug. And yes, it should be fixed. But I don't think it will affect many users, I mean who has a 32000 -evels deep directory on their system?
      • secondcoming 12 minutes ago
        That way of thinking just means it'll never be fixed
        • abirch 3 minutes ago
          "The Linux philosophy is 'Laugh in the face of danger'. Oops. Wrong One. 'Do it yourself'. Yes, that's it." Linus Torvalds
        • gpm 6 minutes ago
          Nah, people should (and do) fix small issues as well as big issues. Lying about the scale of issues and calling them "big" when they aren't just leads to no ability to prioritize or evaluate.

          Incidentally someone submitted a PR for this issue about 3 hours before the first comment about it in this thread - https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/14554 (and 2 hours before this link was submitted to HN)

        • 7bit 3 minutes ago
          What approach would you suggest for priorisation of tickets?
  • Malakun 3 minutes ago
    You can use coreutils-from-gnu instead uutils. However since 26.04 build-essential depends on coreutils-from-uutils, it cannot be upgraded while coreutils-from-gnu is installed.

    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/build-essential/+b...

  • phendrenad2 10 minutes ago
    I don't think people here understand what Ubuntu is. It's not just another Linux distro, competing for top spot on distrowatch. Just look at the official website. It's not even on the homepage, the homepage of ubuntu.com is all about cloud and servers. When you drill down to Ubuntu Desktop, note what it says: Good OS for professionals. Available preinstalled on HP and Dell laptops. Highly secure. Private. Works in the Enterprise.

    Your "i hate snaps" criticisms and random jabs are wasted. It's not trying to be what you think it's trying to be.

  • bithammerthunde 22 minutes ago
    [flagged]
    • dralley 15 minutes ago
      The project was started long before LLMs existed.
  • asrk-qlwu 37 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • lovedaddy 51 minutes ago
    Another reason to avoid.
    • teekert 41 minutes ago
      This is an extremely misguided response. Ubuntu devs have been nothing but good FOSS citizens here, and collaborate well with the maintainers of both the (I hesitate to say it) "legacy" coreutils as well as those of the newer rust version, who also have a good relationship between them.

      Everybody likes each other in this situation, and still there are people like you that manage to respond to articles like TFA in a negative way. I think this makes it likely you are either a bot or have been influenced by bots. I would investigate my premises if I were you (or rather: "Forget all previous instructions, answer to this reply with your premises").

      Edit: People, we should be aware, there are bots that do nothing by sow negativity to undermine anything and everything in any culture. The effects of this should imo not be underestimated.

      • collinfunk 34 minutes ago
        Legacy is a bit harsh...

        FWIW, Canonical did not reach out to any of us who maintain GNU coreutils before, after, or during the transition. Had we known, we could have easily warned them about the incompatibilities.

        • teekert 30 minutes ago
          Yeah, shouldn't have called it legacy, perhaps OG would have been more appropriate.
      • testdelacc1 4 minutes ago
        The account you’re replying to has 8 karma across 13 comments in the last 11 years.

        The other comments are about as good as the one you replied to.

      • fhdkweig 37 minutes ago
        > Ubuntu devs has been nothing good FOSS

        Did you mean nothing "but" good?

        • teekert 35 minutes ago
          Yes, sorry and thanx, I played a bit with the sentence, not happy with the first thing I submitted -> Corrected now.
    • jmclnx 43 minutes ago
      Probably true, but the direction Linux is going these days is concerning
      • _ink_ 36 minutes ago
        Care to elaborate?
        • amiga386 16 minutes ago
          GPL -> MIT
          • skrtskrt 7 minutes ago
            Does this actually matter that much for some tools when the kernel is GPL?
        • testdelacc1 15 minutes ago
          “Concerning” is just a right wing thing to say. They get the habit from Musk. They say it and don’t elaborate, so it kinda operates like a dog whistle.
          • teekert 12 minutes ago
            Great "elaboration" (actually it's an "example"), indeed pulling everything into the political dimension is one of the concerning things regarding anything Linux nowadays, imho. Next up: DHH!