12 comments

  • pushcx 3 hours ago
    Many years ago, I arrived to my half-height cubicle at a Fortune 100 company to see that my desktop PC case was ajar. I set the CRT aside, opened it, and realized that the RAM had been removed. My neighbor explained what must have happened: another employee must have needed to double their RAM from 8 to 16 MB. Requisitioning an upgrade was a weeks-long bureaucratic process that required approval by one's manager and IT, perhaps prompting a review of per-team resource allocation. Repairing a broken PC was a trivial help desk ticket; my PC was restored in an hour or two.
    • saghm 2 hours ago
      Sounds like the neighbor could have just taken the RAM from their own computer out and claimed someone stole it and then called IT to provide them with replacement and then opened it back to and put theirs in. Seems pretty selfish to disrupt someone else's day for this instead of your own; they could have gotten back up and running before you did since they could have put in a help desk ticket before you even got in.
      • rigrassm 9 minutes ago
        > Sounds like the neighbor could have just taken the RAM from their own computer out and claimed someone stole it and then called IT to provide them with replacement and then opened it back to and put theirs in.

        That would be the ideal way _if_ that person had a couple of hours to spare. In my meaningless anecdotal experience someone that would need to resort to this likely wasn't planning to do it.

        More likely they were working on their TPS reports and it got so big they couldn't finish the work before their middle manager would be expecting it in 45 minutes so I'm a panic they sneak in and grab the extra RAM leading to them finishing the report with 1 minute to spare saving the company from insolvency!

        > Seems pretty selfish to disrupt someone else's day for this instead of your own; they could have gotten back up and running before you did since they could have put in a help desk ticket before you even got in.

        On principle I agree but it's not the only option! The real pro wouldn't have just taken the RAM and walked away, they would have taken the RAM and then submitted a ticket letting them know you noticed another employee's PC case open and when you looked noticed the sticks were missing.

        Bonus points if they include a blurb highlighting the importance of that person's PC being functional before they get in the office since that PC has the super important customer files needed for the big meeting in an hour and if they don't have them the company is going to have to make cuts and will likely start with the IT department.

      • robertlagrant 37 minutes ago
        Plot twist: that's what happened in this case.
      • polyterative 1 hour ago
        I like the way you think.
      • bossyTeacher 44 minutes ago
        Maybe. Anyway, let us not forget that both of these actions are unethical.
        • nekusar 33 minutes ago
          Sure, theft is theft.

          But when your corporate policies put weeks/months for an upgrade, and you can do it in 3 hours by reallocating to the same business (no theft), that's just using broken business practices to people's advantages.

          And also, what ethical frame work are you using? Or is this the 'feels' framework?

    • peddling-brink 2 hours ago
      Was this explanation given with a wink and a nod, or did your neighbor always have 16MB of RAM?
    • PorciiVorbesc 1 hour ago
      >Repairing a broken PC was a trivial help desk ticket; my PC was restored in an hour or two.

      Except that even IT would know that a missing 8MB RAM stick is not a defect, it's (petit) theft, since RAM stick have no legs to just wander around by themselves. If it's gone, then an employee stole it.

      Defect is when that 8MB stick would be ... defective.

    • walrus01 3 hours ago
      Reminds me of the kids in my high school who stole individual 4MB 72-pin SIMMs out of a bunch of computer lab desktop PCs to upgrade their approximately equivalent generation motherboard/CPU home systems to whatever was their max capacity, in an era when a 16MB RAM desktop PC was a high performer. Shortly after all the PCs got locks on them.
      • Scoundreller 59 minutes ago
        then they learned how to pick/shim locks
    • dylan604 1 hour ago
      Was this before IT had the ability to look at all of the machines to see which suddenly had a different RAM config?
      • hypercube33 1 hour ago
        I've worked at a bunch of orgs and no one is bothering to look at ram size changes they just note what it's at when they get a call.
      • gpm 1 hour ago
        > from 8 to 16 MB

        Yes

        • dylan604 1 hour ago
          Yeah, I've never been in IT, so I didn't know when tools were available to remote into nodes on the network. The low RAM sizes was precisely what led me to ask
          • prpl 1 hour ago
            We’re talking about ~’94 here…
      • 3eb7988a1663 1 hour ago
        IT tech was probably the one who suggested the approach.
  • muragekibicho 1 hour ago
    Selling 105,800$ worth of compute for 39*200=7800$ is similar to theft I've only encountered in the third world.

    My boiler's copper water supply lines were vandalized for scrap. Their total value was 1540$ but the thief sold the copper for a grand total of 20$. The police and I went to the local scrap market, asked for anyone with a great deal on copper supply lines, and the perp was caught.

    • Scoundreller 21 minutes ago
      Same but for a flexible thin-wall a/c refrigerant line :(
    • thenthenthen 1 hour ago
      Not only in the third world i would say?
  • 2b3a51 1 hour ago
    Hang on, 105 800 / 46 = $2300 per machine. Good heavens, when I was partially responsible for hardware refreshes in a UK public sector organisation with around a thousand endpoint PCs we budgeted something like £600 a box. Have prices really gone up that much in a decade or so, or is this some maximalist prosecution claim?

    RAM thefts: Birmingham UK, Jewellery Quarter, St Paul's Square. Some may remember the solicitor's office on the corner that had 'RAM removed from PCs overnight' etched on the street level windows pre-millenium. Has been converted into posh flats now.

    • PorciiVorbesc 1 hour ago
      >when I was partially responsible for hardware refreshes in a UK public sector organisation with around a thousand endpoint PCs we budgeted something like £600 a box.

      Same here in EU mainland, at every org I worked we used to get budget notebooks to do SW dev on, also in the 600-800 Euro range.

      I think because the US is so much wealthier and can afford to spend more on tech without breaking a sweat. Hence the "Europoor" meme where Europeans can't comprehend the material abundance and spending power of the US.

  • geetee 3 hours ago
    Why in the world is U.S. Customs and Border Protection hiring foreign nationals?
    • walrus01 3 hours ago
      I'm fairly sure you need to at least be a Permanent Resident to get hired, which makes you a US Person (it's a distinct legal definition). Permanent residents are also able to join the military and have been able to do so for a long time. There's enough of them that during the peak of the Iraq War they even held in-country citizenship ceremonies at major bases for people who had filed and completed their citizenship paperwork.
      • thatfrenchguy 2 hours ago
        US person is a tax definition, folks without permanent residency that meet the substantial presence test are also US people. For immigration purposes you use resident alien / nonresident alien.
        • lightedman 1 hour ago
          US Person is not a tax definition, it is a security definition. holds up access badge with US Person written on it Taxes do not care if you're an American or not, you're still paying them.
    • jeffbee 3 hours ago
      For the same reason that foreign nationals can join the military, including the Coast Guard that has an overlapping mission: it's a nation of immigrants and for centuries until very recently most Americans readily recognized the value and necessity of recruiting foreign people into various posts.
      • like_any_other 3 hours ago
        > for centuries until very recently most Americans readily recognized the value and necessity of recruiting foreign people into various posts.

        You forgot to mention that, for those centuries, US immigration was effectively whites-only, until the 1965 Hart-Celler act (that politicians promised wouldn't change this!): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hart-Celler_Act

        • Brybry 1 hour ago
          I think you're conflating naturalization/citizenship with immigration.

          The Naturalization Act of 1790 (and subsequent) acts said you had to be white and have lived in the US for X years already to become a citizen. [1]

          However, per your cited article a law was passed in 1882 to decrease Chinese immigration (who famously immigrated and helped build our railroads). [2] The Chinese immigrants couldn't become citizens but there was nothing (at the time) stopping them from moving and living and working in the US. [3]

          Anecdotally and more recently: my Mexican grandmother, who married my World War 2 veteran grandfather in Mexico, legally immigrated just fine in the 1950s.

          But, yes, most immigration was Europeans and African slaves but probably that was because it was expensive unless you effectively sold yourself. [4]

          [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790

          [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Exclusion_Act

          [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/19th-century_Chinese_immigrati...

          [4] https://www.history.com/articles/u-s-immigration-before-1965...

          • like_any_other 1 hour ago
            > But, yes, most immigration was Europeans and African slaves but probably that was because it was expensive unless you effectively sold yourself.

            You don't think it had anything to do with the Naturalization Act of 1790 that limited citizenship to whites, or the fact that even in 1965, congressmen felt the need to lie to the public and promise that law would not change US demographics? It was just because it was "expensive", that people from Europe immigrated, but not from South America?

        • walrus01 3 hours ago
        • jeffbee 2 hours ago
          Lol no. For almost the entire 20th century, until 1992, Filipinos could just join the Navy or Coast Guard at foreign recruiting posts, without even being American residents, then get fast-tracked for citizenship.
          • sheafification 2 hours ago
            I remember learning about that from Stephenson’s Cryptonomicon, back in the day.

            It’s not even a US-specific thing. Many countries recruit foreigners to their militaries.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_militaries_that_recrui...

            • xhkkffbf 1 hour ago
              I've heard of some people on the lam who wanted to join the French Foreign Legion, a military that gives a no-questions-asked grant of citizenship at the end.
        • parineum 1 hour ago
          You forgot to mention that those people weren't considered "white" at the time.
        • wat10000 2 hours ago
          Why is this so important to mention here?
          • cucumber3732842 40 minutes ago
            >Why is this so important to mention here?

            Race baiting bullshit allows people to poo all over the discussion and avoid having to confront the actual reality of what kinds of people we make good immigrants and citizens and why, because the answers to those questions are gonna cast some shade domestically. Any correlation to skin tone is mostly coincidental or just a figment of how the cards fell historically.

          • like_any_other 2 hours ago
            Correcting jeffbee's misrepresentation of history is important for the same reason they felt the need to misrepresent it in the first place.
            • wat10000 1 hour ago
              That’s not an answer. Their comment didn’t mention whiteness at all. You believe that the whiteness of these immigrants is so important that leaving it out constitutes misrepresentation. Why is it so important? Come on, you obviously think it’s a key part of the story, so spit it out.
              • like_any_other 13 minutes ago
                > Their comment didn’t mention whiteness at all.

                Yes, that was the misrepresentation.

                • wat10000 9 minutes ago
                  Why are you dodging the question of why that even matters? Are you too cowardly to explain your beliefs?
          • black6 2 hours ago
            [flagged]
            • enaaem 1 hour ago
            • mathisfun123 2 hours ago
              Bro since when is just naked racism and xenophobia cool enough that people feel comfortable enough to post nasty shit like this on hn even. Can't we have an auto-ban no tolerance policy for this???
              • pstuart 1 hour ago
                That rock got lifted up 10 years ago and they are now comfortable sunning themselves. Overton Window has shifted hard right.
            • g8oz 2 hours ago
              This is ahistorical nonsense. White immigrants are perfectly capable of retaining native prejudices. Localized tensions among Eastern European immigrants in the earlier 20th century have been documented. And any immigrant group regardless of race will align with American culture a few generations in.

              If by not fitting in you mean that they will continue to look different and retain some links to their ancestral culture then sure.

              • financltravsty 50 minutes ago
                This also assumes eastern europeans are "white" (which is debatable in more serious circles; speaking as an EE myself).
    • rotringlvr 2 hours ago
      [dead]
  • taf2 2 hours ago
    I remember my parents working for a company in the 90s and the mailroom was one the most common places things went missing… aka theft. I recall my mom had her purse stolen at her cube… theft from within similar to security exploits from within seem to be the most real security vulnerability to be focused on. That sshd that can only be accessed from a few specific ips with the right port knocking is not how you get hacked… at least not normally
  • 1970-01-01 2 hours ago
    Bured lede: i7 CPUs for border patrol.. why?
    • kube-system 2 hours ago
      For the same reasons fortune 500s will spec the same for their office workers. Labor is expensive compared to hardware. It is often cheaper to spend a little bit more on hardware to avoid supporting multiple configuration, exceptions, more frequent updates, support tickets from power users, etc

      If you pinch pennies buying a spec that exactly meets today’s needs, and next year MS Teams releases a new update that requires more resources, you don’t want to buy a whole building full of new computers.

      • nortlov 1 hour ago
        Border Patrol’s IT department more forward looking than the rest of the government..? sign me up! I’ve been using the same laptop for nearly 5 years now. It’s painfully slow and does not meet the needs of the latest Teams updates.
        • tastyfreeze 38 minutes ago
          We are on 3 year refresh cycles at my office. I always feel guilty when I am forced to get a new machine to replace the perfectly working but 3 year old one. At least a 3 year old machine will still sell as surplus.
      • formerly_proven 1 hour ago
        You seem to live in a bit of a bubble, personally I've never seen anything other than penny-pinching on corporate laptops and everybody everywhere complaining about the same.

        (I don't mean that IT departments hand out bottom-of-the-barrel plastic laptops which break every five minutes, but rather fairly low-spec Thinkpad/HP/Dell business laptops with just enough RAM that their bloated Windows 11 installs are barely not swapping when idle and just enough SSD space that Windows Update doesn't fail)

        • kube-system 1 hour ago
          Poorly run IT organizations certainly exist, even in F500. I’m telling you why it’s done, not that it universally is.
        • theandrewbailey 1 hour ago
          I work in e-waste recycling. Most of the PCs and laptops I see are corporate IT decommissions. Most of those have i5 CPUs, and only a handful are i7. Few are cruel enough to afflict their wage slaves with an i3 or less.
    • goku_vegeta 2 hours ago
      i7 CPUs have been used for all sorts of PC configurations. Your standard library at a university or college, the office worker desktop who does nothing but use web based applications for their job, and so on.

      The pricing difference between an i5 and an i7 aren't really that big when you go to Dell and tell them I need 4,000 desktops. DHS isn't paying the same pricing difference as we would be when purchasing a boxed CPU.

    • Ekaros 1 hour ago
      At certain point people just don't care about saving money. You get a budget and then get quotes and pick one that matches what you are allowed to spend. If there is multiple with same spend go for one with bigger numbers.
    • akerl_ 2 hours ago
      At a certain scale, the relative complexity (both in terms of inventory management and dealing with upgrade requests / approvals / etc) tends itself towards picking a baseline spec that can work for the overwhelming majority of your fleet.
    • tomasphan 2 hours ago
      Because it runs Windows hehe
    • phendrenad2 1 hour ago
      Isn't Palantir a webapp? Full of maps and lists of stuff? Seems like a recipe for "chrome has stopped responding..."
    • arcfour 2 hours ago
      It's just a typical enterprise PC configuration. Probably because nobody writes efficient software these days.
      • hypercube33 1 hour ago
        45 security apps cut the ram and CPU performance in half out of the gate, then you have Win11 with its web gui and users who complain about any slowness so i7 or r7 is about the norm most places / bulk big 3 oems make for business.
        • Scoundreller 40 minutes ago
          and rowhammer etc mitigations microcode updates

          personally I have an i7 in the lab that turned into a crawl on Youtube because they started sending VP9 video by default, but i7 doesn't have hardware decode for it. Got a plugin to force h264 (h264ify) and it's back to normal.

          Then you have situations where a software update adds a CPU instruction dependency and straight up doesn't work anymore.

          Had to install and force-retain an old version of Spotify client on a bench lab PC because the new versions require AVX-1/2. It's a streaming audio player...

  • walrus01 3 hours ago
    If you've ever driven through the land crossing border in either direction at Calais, Maine (and St. Stephen, NB), they're both really tiny and sleepy places. It's astonishing to think that he wouldn't get caught. Like, you cripple the PCs of a place where your colleagues use them on a day to day basis and think nobody is going to notice? Real genius move there, bud.
    • hammock 2 hours ago
      The border guys are there are really aggressive too. I canoed the st croix up around there and you are warned not to paddle north of the halfway line in the middle of the river… agents will literally pop out of the woods and start reproaching you
      • Scoundreller 35 minutes ago
        obviously this isn't official advice, but are they misinformed and don't like you doing legal things that bother them?

        > Any small pleasure vessel leaving a United States port into international or foreign waters, without a call at a foreign port, does not satisfy the foreign departure requirement. Therefore, certain fishing vessels, cruises to nowhere, or any vessel that leaves from a United States port and returns without calling a foreign port or place, has not departed the United States.

        Dunno how much emphasis to put on the word "port"

        https://www.cbp.gov/travel/pleasure-boats-private-flyers/ple...

        While it's a more inland water, Large vessels effectively can't transit through Windows/Detroit shipping channel without multiple border line crossings: https://i0.wp.com/niche-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/1...

  • stephenlf 2 hours ago
    Robin Hood?
  • like_any_other 3 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • Sarkie 3 hours ago
      "But it's not really relevant" correct
    • earth-tattoo 3 hours ago
      [flagged]
  • arjie 1 hour ago
    [deleted unsubstantiated text]
    • sdenton4 1 hour ago
      This does not appear anywhere in this article. Just sowing misinformation?
  • londons_explore 2 hours ago
    And how much did this investigation cost, when you account for all the hours spent by investigators, lawers, judges, etc?

    My guess is it was a huge net loss for the taxpayer.

    The more effective move for the nation would have been for this guys boss to have confronted him and said "computer parts keep going missing on your shift. You have 2 weeks to make sure all the computers are back to their exact original config or we're gonna investigate and you could end up in prison".

    • genidoi 2 hours ago
      It’s obviously not about the cost of the parts, there just can’t be any tolerance for criminal conduct in government agency employees.
      • trebligdivad 1 hour ago
        IMHO a bigger worry is if they were opening the case then they could have modified it for spying or changing contents. I'd have thought stuff like this should have case alarm notification and inventory change alerts.
    • toss1 2 hours ago
      Sure, that'd be more "cost efficient", and for a small one-off, probably better. But law enforcement and justice is not a profit center.

      Merely making the threats like you specify and even having it restored encourages more crime by making the crime effectively zero-risk — either he gets away with it, or simply needs to restore things to the way they were and the only cost to the criminal is the wasted effort. Makes it so crime pays.

      And no, the investigation of watching a bunch of videos to observe the perp opening the computer cases, and writing up a complaint, is probably lower cost than the multiple thefts.

    • rotringlvr 2 hours ago
      [dead]