3 comments

  • DC-3 24 minutes ago
    Coincidentally I was trying this out yesterday as a potential option for automated porn filtering for the imageboard that I administrate. It is very lightweight which is good but the performance is not great. Some weird false positives and it does a bad job with flat chested women which is very concerning to me because it leads me to think it won’t be effective against CSAM.
    • RobotToaster 2 minutes ago
      Weird, with it being from the UAE I'd expect it to detect any woman with an exposed ankle as porn.
    • instagraham 21 minutes ago
      it is amusing that a model from a country that has banned porn would ever be developed. Wouldn't there be hurdles for them to access "data" at every stage?

      (I know they must have used a VPN for training but it does seem like an added hoop. OFC the UAE's block is also not particularly thorough.)

      You'd assume such models would do better in a laissez-faire nsfw environment than in a walled garden of relatively-less sin.

  • ggm 1 hour ago
    Always two sides to classification. Finding and Banning. It's tempting to ask if this is one, the other or both by the same people.
    • totetsu 24 minutes ago
      Planet-scale nude-selfie extenuation racket?
  • nlanandkumar 55 minutes ago
    [dead]