8 comments

  • geori 14 minutes ago
    Lol at "On secondary markets, investors have propelled the company to a $1.5 billion valuation."
    • lukan 0 minutes ago
      Fixed it seems.
    • jasonjmcghee 11 minutes ago
      typo? or did an editor see the original and say "trillion must be a typo"
  • doughnutstracks 33 minutes ago
    At first I read the title as a possible missile strike on Anthropic's office by a hostile actor.
  • mandarinclips 8 minutes ago
    Everyone should boycott Anthropic and stop using Claude. I'm starting with myself.
  • ReptileMan 16 minutes ago
    It is not as if they can't write encouraging prompts to mythos from everywhere.
  • bediger4000 12 minutes ago
    Wow, this is bad news. Without in-office collaboration, company culture will collapse. The organic moments of spontaneous synergy won't take place. Perhaps OpenAI or even xAI will take over as leading company. Grim.
    • fluxusars 10 minutes ago
      "Claude, was this sarcasm?"

      - You're absolutely right!

  • bbor 22 minutes ago
    The idea of Anthropic allowing a contractor to squeeze such a tiny cost center at such a massive PR cost right before their IPO is just an objective blunder, IMHO. They should've replied to that email with a quick "No, you will be negotiating with the union tomorrow morning. You maybe eventually saving millions right now could cost us literally billions."
    • kennywinker 16 minutes ago
      Strikes only happen when management has refused to negotiate in good faith already. Usually many times refused.
      • forestrywat 13 minutes ago
        I think the parent poster is saying, "management, get your fucking head on straight and negotiate properly".
    • alephnerd 18 minutes ago
      Ik the building intimately - it's not Anthroptic but the building's security company. SEIU is working to organize Allied Universal in California.

      Support SEIU organizing them (their fighting the good fight in this case), but this specific article is clickbait.

      • forestrywat 15 minutes ago
        So you go to the building owner and say, "give them what they want or we walk." Security team probably doesn't want outrageous changes. Building owner probably just being greedy.
        • t098i3 13 minutes ago
          As I understand it, this union negotiation isn't with a single building, it's with multiple large staffing firms across California
        • alephnerd 14 minutes ago
          You can't in most cases. These buildings are owned by larger conglomerates and are out of scope of landlord-leasee negotiations.

          Allied United is one of the larger security augmentation firms in the nation, which makes is harder. For example, my Alma mater was secured by Allied Universal as well as a dedicated PD because the dedicated PD didn't want to be bag check for a library when they have been dealing with real crime (eg. A comrade in their sister PD across town's was shot by the Boston marathon bombers).

  • wonderwonder 41 minutes ago
    And there goes every single rational for having a security team at the disaster bunkers the billionaires are building
    • derwiki 35 minutes ago
      They’ll be armed Boston Dynamics robots soon
      • toomuchtodo 7 minutes ago
        Bunker busters are not picky, and can be safely delivered from altitude autonomously.
    • sailfast 8 minutes ago
      Don’t think those folks are union…
    • philipallstar 35 minutes ago
      Presumably they'll have stuff there the security team wants.
      • deadbunny 13 minutes ago
        The security team have guns and aren't given a 2nd thought, kinda invisible even. They don't need to negotiate.
      • zbentley 32 minutes ago
        Like security guards' families.

        Awful, but not without historical precedent.

        • somenameforme 10 minutes ago
          Which precedent?

          Grunts under coercion has a rich history that's still ongoing, but these sort of guards are those that would have both weapons and the guarded in their direct vicinity. I can't think of any historic example where this wasn't the loyalest of the loyal types.

        • Tade0 16 minutes ago
          Fear the security guard who has nothing to lose.
        • philipallstar 26 minutes ago
          I did almost write that! But if disaster really strikes, then just resources will be useful.
    • tracerbulletx 34 minutes ago
      There have been plenty of times in history (almost all times) that physically weaker men have secured the loyalty of soldiers with wealth and influence during periods where strong centralized civic authorities did not exist.
    • bpodgursky 39 minutes ago
      If civilization collapses, the billionaires are correctly assuming the security team will stop following SEIU strike authorization protocol.
      • ceejayoz 34 minutes ago
        They are perhaps incorrectly assuming the security team with all the weaponry will remain loyal to them.
        • john_strinlai 25 minutes ago
          that's probably dependent on the specific genre of collapse we get to enjoy
        • bpodgursky 26 minutes ago
          Sure. Who knows.

          But, historically, strongmen/chieftains have not had incredible trouble keeping their goons under control. Most threats from from palace coups not popular revolt. Most normal people in uncertain times like order and aren't going to flip the table on a system that gives them stability, food and shelter.

          • nemomarx 11 minutes ago
            Would "one of you promises the security team better conditions if they kill a rival" not be how palace coups usually work?
          • ceejayoz 23 minutes ago
            > But, historically, strongmen/chieftains have not had incredible trouble keeping their goons under control.

            Sure. But some of them seize power from others on their way up via force.

      • dayvid 19 minutes ago
        Just pay them well enough. Or pay the people at the top a good amount of money to keep the people below in check and have some hope you can rise to the top for a small portion of the people.
        • inigyou 15 minutes ago
          If civilization collapses, money is useless
  • creatune 26 minutes ago
    [dead]