Router by Ramp

(router.com)

69 points | by zackfield 2 hours ago

13 comments

  • aizk 47 minutes ago
    I just want to know how much the domain cost.
    • reticulates 10 minutes ago
      The domain was previously owned by Innovation HQ (innovationhq.com) who own tens of thousands of domains, some of the best in the world (they sold robot.com not long ago, owns/runs whatismyip.com). Innovation were asking ~$5 million for it earlier this year. Given the huge money flowing into AI router projects, I expect Ramp paid very close to asking, or perhaps a little more. So, $5 million +/- $1 million is my guess. I assume Ramp will announce the price in a few weeks to generate some more press for the project.
      • dvaplima 8 minutes ago
        I wonder if more companies use web domains as "investments" aswell
    • zackfield 14 minutes ago
    • latchkey 29 minutes ago
      Less than $7B.
      • Jfrydman 5 minutes ago
        can confirm, was less than $7B
    • fragmede 39 minutes ago
      and who owned it. Cisco, from the first Internet boom could have wanted that.
  • embedding-shape 1 hour ago
    The fact that they put "every model" repeatedly, then don't actually support even close to "most mainstream models", makes me highly doubtful their service will be more honest and forthcoming once I'm signed up.
    • zackfield 23 minutes ago
      let us know which "mainstream" models you feel like we are missing support for! https://docs.router.com/supported-models
      • nattaylor 2 minutes ago
        Muse Spark, Gemini, mistral and something from cohere would be nice

        That said the current models ain't bad!

      • minraws 8 minutes ago
        GLM 5.3 (maybe because not open weights)

        Otherwise I think they just meant chinese models not mainstream models.

        Like Hy3, Mimo, etc. Also gemini models but not sure if they are mainstream anymore.

        • Jfrydman 2 minutes ago
          I believe you are the first to request these

          Save for GLM 5.3 - coming soon once it percolates through our providers.

    • dewey 49 minutes ago
      I wouldn't read too much into it, that was probably a big rush job once the Stripe / openrouter news broke.
  • dvaplima 11 minutes ago
    Thats basically a direct response of OpenRouter by Stripe? ahaha
  • throw03172019 24 minutes ago
    Why do these Router companies never have BAAs? They can easily get them with the vendors, why not sign with the customer?
    • latchkey 3 minutes ago
      because they would be meaningless words on trust me bro paper.
  • zelias 1 hour ago
    It can't be a coincidence that this dropped today, the same day news dropped about the Stripe acquisition of OpenRouter
    • skeledrew 41 minutes ago
      Same day? The acquisition has been public knowledge for at least a week.
  • gonzalohm 56 minutes ago
    I guess this is the world we live in now. All companies no matter which sector they belong to must buy AI crap.

    A few years ago, companies buying random companies from a completely different sector was frowned upon by stakeholders

    • dgellow 46 minutes ago
      It’s also so strange how they all play the exact same game. Everybody creates pretty much the same products. Every software company will have a chatbot, an agentic harness, a model router, and whatever will be the next trend. It’s not an ecosystem where we see lots of different ideas with some crazy, some failing, some succeeding, it really feels like it’s a single same bet and all SF companies are sort of acting like one homogeneous meta company
      • b1gTekken 34 minutes ago
        Same happened at the start of the cloud era; everyone created a YT competitor, Twitter clones, MySpace clones, a cloud platform to host on (though it was just a wrapper around AWS like wrappers we see around OpenAI [looking at you Heroku])

        Big tech emails leaked during a trial over a decade ago; C-level types agreed they need not truly compete and see each other as one big company.

        Screen based filter bubble living has kept the digital generation ignorant; it's all built on the same physical principles. No point pretending, at their level, they're doing anything truly different

        Mirror neurons are a helluva drug: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_neuron

        Society evolves slowly as generational churn is not fast

    • zackfield 39 minutes ago
      we (Ramp) didn't buy anything, we built a model router in house!
      • latchkey 28 minutes ago
        "create a cloudflare worker that proxies requests to any number of neoclouds. make no mistakes."
        • ashdksnndck 11 minutes ago
          Ramp showed up late into a market and have had more success than almost every company who tried before them. They seem to have some execution skill.
  • darknoon 57 minutes ago
    they really buried the lede on which models are supported, then the link is broken as of now to the list (https://app.router.com/supported-models)
    • zackfield 25 minutes ago
      thanks for the heads up! fixed!
  • skeledrew 40 minutes ago
    Looking forward to their inclusion on models.dev.
  • solarkraft 1 hour ago
    Incredible timing.
  • copperx 1 hour ago
    Routing requests to the ideal model? that's some big talk right there.
  • ChrisArchitect 51 minutes ago
    That's some domain;

    Blog post: https://ramp.com/blog/router-launch

  • pickledish 1 hour ago
    router.com! Cool domain though that must have been expensive :P
    • embedding-shape 1 hour ago
      > that must have been expensive

      Indeed, probably not cheap. Ironically, they see themselves as the ones that should help others "stop overpaying for things" and "help companies make better spending decisions":

      > Wait, Ramp bought router.com? We did. It was either this or spend the next year spelling out a longer URL on podcasts. More importantly, we build tools that help companies make better spending decisions and stop overpaying for things.

      • Jfrydman 7 minutes ago
        It's certainly cheaper than buying OpenRouter for ~7B
      • ajd555 57 minutes ago
        Indeed. Also, ramp.com is shorter than router.com, so I don't really understand the "spelling out a longer URL on podcasts". I guess router.com is just clearer for customers?
  • eamag 47 minutes ago
    US only, right?