Git at any scale

(cursor.com)

106 points | by meetpateltech 1 day ago

5 comments

  • brasic 1 day ago
    It’s hard to overstate the reputation of the author of this post. Everything good about GitHub’s internal systems seemed to have his name all over it (I realize that today this statement hits different than a few years ago). Our times at GH didn’t overlap much but hearing the fact that he’s working at cursor increases my estimation of their engineering org by leaps and bounds.
  • eatonphil 33 minutes ago
    > The "fan-out" is synchronized with a classic consensus algorithm called 3PC (three-phase commit) so that a push is only accepted if a majority of the nodes acknowledge it.

    Doesn't 3PC require all nodes to agree, not just a majority?

  • biwills 1 day ago
    > What about consensus? Elections? Which server is the primary for a given repository? It also doesn't matter! There's no state and no consensus here. Any server can be the primary. All updates to the write-ahead log are synchronized with an atomic compare-and-swap (CAS) operation on S3, so it's always safe for any instance of a repository to receive a push.

    Again reminded of what an amaizing piece of engineering S3 is (99.999999999% - 11 nines of durability) [1]

    1: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/DataDu...

    • nojvek 1 day ago
      Not just durability. But read after write guarantee on a distributed object store.

      How many startups and corporations built on top of S3 semantics?

      Snowflake and the big lakehouses are one of them. They use S3 as giant disk in the sky.

  • vegadw 1 day ago
    Remember, don't put large objects in cnt, it makes it a real pain later.
  • ChrisArchitect 1 day ago
    Related:

    Cursor Origin Code Hosting

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49334209