Kimi Work attaches raw agent sessions to feedback reports

18 points | by ryanmerket 22 hours ago

3 comments

  • wren6991 1 hour ago
    > Why It Matters

    Thanks Claude, the analysis looks to be load-bearing, and dare I say the gun may be smoking. This sharpens the framing considerably.

    Honest caveat: most AI providers' privacy policies have an explicit carve-out for feedback. (Uploading the last 5 sessions wholesale is pretty wild though.)

    • trjordan 38 minutes ago
      FWIW, this particular header in news articles is a deliberate choice originated by Axios. It’s notable enough and effective enough they wrote a book about it.

      https://www.axios.com/smart-brevity

      Did Claude write this article? Probably. But this style of article is exactly what you’d expect from a pre-AI version of this website as well.

  • KronisLV 11 minutes ago
    > when you send a feedback report, it attaches the 5 latest sessions to the report with no notice or heads up or anything.

    Not informing the user of that feels wrong, and even then you'd probably want like a dropdown to choose between just the current session vs the last 5 if that much context is really needed, with either Off or 1 being the default.

    Claude Code has a clear disclaimer, probably exactly how it should be done:

    > Submitting this report will send the entire current conversation to Anthropic for future improvements to our models. Learn More

  • bbg2401 56 minutes ago
    You’ve submitted nearly 100 AI written articles from this source in the past 40 days…
    • fishfasell 53 minutes ago
      AI has completely killed blogs for me, I don't bother anymore unless I'm familiar with the blog from years before.
      • cautiouscat 22 minutes ago
        I feel the same way but don’t let some bad blogs dissuade you from others IMO. You can tell pretty quickly if the author cares enough to write it themselves or have an agent do it.