8 comments

  • sarabveer 41 minutes ago
    > Even in 2026, a huge number of ISPs still rely on PPPoE, including Bell Canada, AT&T Fiber, and Xfinity in the US, along with the vast majority of ISPs in Europe, Asia, and China.

    Comcast (Xfinity) does not use PPPoE.

  • davidhariri 1 hour ago
    In my specific situation I was able to use this WAS-110 to get full speed PPPoE from my fiber provider (Bell).

    https://pon.wiki/guides/masquerade-as-the-bce-inc-giga-hub-2...

    • asniper 31 minutes ago
      Sure, it bypasses the supplied hardware but does not solve PPPoE limitations on UniFi.

      I use the same WAS-110 on Bell.

  • sage981 1 hour ago
    The UCG Fiber numbers make the case: this is a SoC acceleration gap, not a PPPoE overhead problem. Half-bridge is a workaround for hardware Ubiquiti shipped.
  • nottorp 1 hour ago
    Oh thanks. My local ISP insists on pppoe even for business lines.

    I like the unifi APs but then using their gateways is a no-no.

  • q3k 2 hours ago
    I miss when this kind of content would've just been two paragraphs and a config snippet.

    (also, this isn't a "Show HN")

  • cr3ative 2 hours ago
    I always suspected this was possible but having it demonstrated is excellent. I would assume this would be of most benefit on an OpenWRT box which _does_ support hardware offload!
  • simonjgreen 2 hours ago
    I mean at this point just ditch the Unifi? You have a much more capable gateway in play now that needs to have equal to greater throughput than the one you are bridging for.
    • p_l 1 hour ago
      No, the half-bridge is less capable for various functions, but happens to have hardware PPPoE offload which makes it faster for this specific function but not for others
  • mono442 2 hours ago
    I guess what they did works but it makes some of valid ip addresses unavailable.
    • ksk23 1 hour ago
      Was thinking along the same lines; why do we hardcode a /24? Is that reality in ISP last mile networks?!