Why the future is local app

(getapps.cafe)

25 points | by knlam 5 hours ago

12 comments

  • euroderf 1 hour ago
    This really matters in map apps when you're on the road. Apple Maps is all very nice with transit planning but without a solid net connection it lies there mutely. Organic Maps (and others) that use downloaded OSM data work well with nothing more than GPS. You can get a transit plan (trains & trams & buses, and the transfers among them) without up-to-the-minute arrival info.
    • stephbook 16 minutes ago
      Google and Apple maps have an offline mode. Just select the area you want downloaded and that's that.
      • palata 2 minutes ago
        Have you ever tried Organic Maps or CoMaps?

        Last time I tried with Google I could only download a relatively small area, and it would only be available temporarily.

        With CoMaps, I can download entire countries and keep them forever. That's pretty different.

  • curtisblaine 1 minute ago
    Didn't we say a thousand of times that local apps are not "winning" because they can't be monetized (a bit like web games)?
  • peter_retief 19 minutes ago
    I am using the older version of raspberry pi 3 B+ to host mail and web services locally behind firewalls. There is a use case here for developing for remote areas that have unreliable internet and power. Still a way to go but there is something in place. This site is a beta running from my lounge at home. https://localboxmail.co.za/software.html
  • hexasquid 26 minutes ago
    I think some people who grew up with web apps didn't know local native apps preceded them.
  • nasso_dev 15 minutes ago
    slightly off-topic but i dont really know how to put it in any other way: everything under this domain feels fake

    i am looking very hard for any hint of humanity behind any of it, but all i see is a vibe-coded website, marketing a huge collection of vibe-coded apps by generating articles like this one. even their social media presence (linked on their blog[1]) feels like agents that have been told to role-play on X.com as caricatures of their position/role in the (made up?) company

    and i mean.... come on, a $5 web browser??? that's just a wrapper around the system's webview??? why would anyone think this is something worth spending their time building, economically speaking??? even FREE browsers are struggling in this hyper-competitive market. if you make a paid browser it better be the best browser of all time, not some vibe-coded average of every other browser

    i agree with the premise, im all for local-first software. but this really feels like the AI-era equivalent of the countless scams we've seen during the crypto-era...

    [1]: https://getapps.cafe/blog/a-new-name-behind-the-counter-welc...

    • stavros 9 minutes ago
      Yeah, I read the subheader, saw Claude, and closed the tab.
  • cryptos 2 hours ago
    This article looks a bit superficial to me. The cloud has definitely advantages, like having the same data on all devices and it provides some kind of backup. The mentioned downsides could be adressed by better software archticture or e2e encryption.
    • reustle 16 minutes ago
      Obsidian is just one example of how powerful local apps can be with a generic sync behind them (icloud sync, gdrive, obsidian sync, etc)
    • bombcar 35 minutes ago
      The better software architecture is huge - if done right. It's the difference between cloud-only, local-only, and local-first. Not all apps are entirely easy as local-first, but you can often get 80-90% of what you need as that; and leave sync and collisions as rare situations to be handled manually.
  • wuhhh 2 hours ago
    Well, when the author eventually gives up trying to sell people names of apps and the domain expires, I’m sure it will present good value when it gets bought and repurposed as a porn site; the first two apps under quick utilities are CreamShot and DripCleaner?!
    • hoppp 2 hours ago
      The domain was registered on 15 May 2026 so these are probably vibe coded apps, thats why they are sold so cheap. The naming is probably AI too.

      No proof yet that they will be maintained but they seem to be pretty simple. Single use software, sold as a bundle.

  • nonamee 1 hour ago
    No, the opposite, the only app which is save is the app you never ship (stays in a cloud). No binary or source code available to search for exploits by ai.
  • neuropacabra 3 hours ago
    This is a nice article and I genuinely agree with its premises. Would be nice to reclaim a privacy back. A bit. But this article would be much stringer if it was not generated by Claude
  • BiteCode_dev 54 minutes ago
    I always wanted to do local and offline first app with optional sync, but the difference in amount of work is just stagering.

    Now with LLM to do the boiler plate of event logs, healing, retries and testing all that, it's finally reasonable for a side projet.

    And the result is great, the UI is reactive, it works in malls with bad signal, you get a no account experience almost for free...

    I do all my apps like that now.

    • jonathanstrange 3 minutes ago
      The problem with native apps are the app stores and their requirements. For true cross-platform, you need to develop for 5 platforms (macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android), each with their own technology, favored programming language and ecosystem, deployment, certificates, regulations, requirements, guidelines, arbitrary app review policies, categories, etc. I'm doing that currently and it's madness.

      IMHO, it would be best if developers all over the world boycotted proprietary platforms entirely. (Of course, this is never going to happen, I'm just saying.)

  • feverzsj 2 hours ago
    There is not much choice when even your phone OS isn't a local app.
  • bitwize 2 hours ago
    The future is you pay $1000 for a "cloud terminal" with 4 GiB of RAM and maybe 128 GiB of storage, and all of your apps live, metered, in the cloud. Arbitrary operating systems, and even arbitrary application binaries, are not allowed, in order to comply with laws and regulations, as well as non-legally-binding policies set by credit card companies in response to pressure groups, on what you may compute and what you may communicate. The government can intercept any communications or interactions you have with online services at any time, and any time you touch a computing device it's traceable back to your real name.

    It's nice to build decentralized personal software and think you're fighting the good fight, but all the government has to do is pass a law and suddenly that option is, practically and effectively, closed to you. We're headed down that path, and that's before you get to the fact computers powerful enough to support today's more interesting applications are just being priced out of the consumer market altogether.

    • ferrouswheel 2 hours ago
      So why can i still run all my decentralised apps? Where's this magical shutdown the government is going to do? Are they going saturate the airwaves to destroy mesh networks or hunt every mesh node on the planet?

      Go home with your nihilism.

      • HPsquared 1 hour ago
        Simply making something illegal will reduce it by 99%.