Font-Family Recommendations

(chrismorgan.info)

34 points | by birdculture 3 days ago

3 comments

  • sometimez 1 hour ago
    So basically just use monospace, serif, or sans-serif because you can't 100% be sure it'll render correctly?
    • xigoi 50 minutes ago
      Fuck that. I don’t want my website to look ugly because 99.9% of users don’t bother to change the defaults.
      • holsta 3 minutes ago
        If browsers were slightly better at asking users, maybe we'd all have our three favourite fonts and background-, text- and link-colours instead of what someone else prefers we stare at all day.
      • kibwen 19 minutes ago
        This is not at all what the article recommends. I recommend actually reading it.
        • xigoi 6 minutes ago
          > 3. Strongly consider using only a generic family

          Seems clear enough.

  • porphyra 1 hour ago
    > If not inlined, subresources can fail to load for all kinds of network reasons.

    Also, it's commonly recommended to load fonts asynchronously/deferred without blocking the main page render. But I HATE it when the page jumps around as it cycles through different fonts before the real one loads. I'd rather get dinged on PageSpeed insights with "Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. Deferring or inlining can move these network requests out of the critical path." rather than have everything popping about for the first second. Is it just me?

  • Terretta 23 hours ago
    These days you can have an LLM code you up python to custom match visual metrics from your preferred web fonts to the likely user fonts across your statistical user base.