7 comments

  • xnx 56 minutes ago
  • superfrank 55 minutes ago
    I've got a couple of LLM wikis running for different purposes. I just pointed Claude at Karpathy's Github Gist and said "do this" and it set up and has maintained them ever since. So far no issue with that.

    Can you explain why the version linked is better?

    Gist link: https://gist.github.com/karpathy/442a6bf555914893e9891c11519...

  • jarbus 1 hour ago
    Where is this 10x number coming from?
  • dolebirchwood 1 hour ago
    What if I only want 6x better performance? Is there a knob or slider to dial it down?
  • adithyassekhar 1 hour ago
    Edit: On closer look this looks useful without the coding harness pitch.
    • nvk 58 minutes ago
      This is not a product, its a foss lib
  • sppfly 1 hour ago
    This kind of llm bragging title and AI generated webpage makes me gross.
  • esafak 1 hour ago
    How does this differ from https://context7.com/ ?
    • kordlessagain 1 hour ago
      LLM Wiki is client-side and local-first (plain Markdown, Obsidian-friendly) designed for deep multi-agent topic research (e.g. automated thesis/counter-thesis runs, local session memory redaction).

      Context7 is a hosted SaaS/on-premise MCP server indexing API/library docs (GitHub, Confluence, OpenAPI) to provide coding assistants with fresh, version-specific developer context.

      Essentially: LLM Wiki compiles topic research vaults on your local disk, whereas Context7 acts as a semantic doc/API search gateway for programming.

      • esafak 56 minutes ago
        So the benefit is in caching the resources to avoid web queries, and massaging them to make them amenable to analysis? For intellectual work I imagine it would be useful if it could access gated content, like commercial reports?