.gitignore Isn't the Only Way to Ignore Files in Git

(nelson.cloud)

88 points | by FergusArgyll 4 hours ago

7 comments

  • hk1337 53 minutes ago
    ~/.config/git/ignore and ~/.config/git/config is the proper place for your global git config and ignore instead of creating a ~/.gitignore_global and changing the config. IMO.

    my dotfiles are a lot smaller at the root level taking advantage of the ~/.config/ for a lot more things.

    the git exclude isn't used as much because it doesn't get committed to the repository so you'd have to recreate it each time you wanted to use it. that doesn't mean they're bad just why they are not used.

    • b40d-48b2-979e 42 minutes ago
      As a bonus, you can (should?) version control your `~/.config` dir to enable future revisions and sharing.
      • hk1337 27 minutes ago
        Absolutely. On that subject, I prefer the Atlassian method for storing dotfiles in git but sometimes I feel like it's Mootools vs jQuery all over again.
  • judofyr 49 minutes ago
    Not sure where I picked up this, but I’ve added this to my global Git ignore:

        attic
    
    That way you can just create an attic directory in any project where you can keep random stuff that should never be committed. I’ve yet to find a repo which actually has such a directory checker in.
  • jeremyscanvic 16 minutes ago
    I knew about .git/info/exclude and ~/.config/git/ignore but not about git-check-ignore(1). Neat!
  • Hendrikto 1 hour ago
    This is just a very low-effort regurgitation of this: https://git-scm.com/docs/gitignore
    • jagged-chisel 1 hour ago
      Hey, come on now - they added 'check-ignore' which is good complementary advice.
    • _the_inflator 1 hour ago
      You made my day. Everything is said and explained there.

      Ok, sometimes a more vivid and visually explanatory style would help, but here still Google is your friend for individual concepts.

      One of the best resources there is. git is a hell of a tool. It looks simple but is so beautifully versatile without being complex or not deductive.

      • y2244 58 minutes ago
        "Google is your friend for individual concepts."

        Asking aLlm is the new google

      • b40d-48b2-979e 53 minutes ago

            git is a hell of a tool. It looks simple but is so beautifully versatile without being complex
        
            without being complex
        
        Uh, what?
        • rafram 51 minutes ago
          What part of

             Enumerating objects: 15, done.
             Counting objects: 100% (15/15), done.
             Delta compression using up to 10 threads
             Compressing objects: 100% (8/8), done.
             Writing objects: 100% (8/8), 1.43 KiB | 1.43 MiB/s, done.
             Total 8 (delta 7), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 (from 0)
             remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (7/7), completed with 7 local objects.
          
          don't you understand?!
  • barbazoo 7 minutes ago
    Exclude sounds like a recipe for sadness.
  • bryancoxwell 1 hour ago
    I use the ever living hell out of .git/info/exclude. Works great for scripts/Makefiles I only want locally and collaborators wouldn’t care about or be able to use.
    • RSHEPP 54 minutes ago
      Interested in examples of the types of scripts others collaborators wouldn't be able to use? Like scripts for PR workflows?
      • junon 50 minutes ago
        Usually when I'm working in one part of the codebase and I have sample data or something at a specific path on my local machine and Im testing the same thing over and over again will I make a Makefile or something and info/exclude it to help me keep focused. That's one way I use it.
  • bitvvip 32 minutes ago
    I still like using gitignore very much