Unicode Fonts and Tools for X11

(cam.ac.uk)

20 points | by kristianp 2 days ago

3 comments

  • jech 2 hours ago
    That was a long time ago.

    Traditionally, character's under Unix were encoded in a locale-specific manner: ISO 8859-1 in Western Europe, ISO 8859-2 in Eastern Europe, EUC-JP in Japan, etc. In the 1990s, there was a major push to get XFree86 (the ancestor of X.Org) to switch to locale-independent UTF-8, lead mainly by Markus Kuhn and Bruno Haible.

    The link is to Markus Kuhn's web page, which appears to describe the UTF_8 software available around 1998 or so.

    • sheept 52 minutes ago
      UTF-8 is not locale independent. You cannot correctly render multilingual UTF-8 text without also specifying its locale, and some transformations like uppercase/lowercase also depend on the locale.
      • Joker_vD 4 minutes ago
        > You cannot correctly render multilingual UTF-8 text without also specifying its locale

        You can render it pretty well, not perfect, but good enough to actually read it, as opposed to not being able to render it at all or rendering mojibake à la Кракозябры instead.

      • sourcegrift 29 minutes ago
        Eg: some cjk characters render differently based on whether mainland China, Taiwan, or Japan. One example 骨 (from my old notes so tiny chance this example is incorrect)
  • j16sdiz 18 minutes ago
    > created 1998-09-22 – last modified 2022-12-07
  • ufocia 1 hour ago
    A font is not a typeface