You Don't Love Systemd Timers Enough

(blog.tjll.net)

26 points | by yacin 3 hours ago

7 comments

  • hombre_fatal 30 minutes ago
    NixOS comes with systemd, so I've been using it as a first-class part of managing stuff. It's great, especially coming from macOS' launchd.

    Which makes it nice to distribute a tool for NixOS so that it can lean into systemd instead of as some bolted-on afterthought.

    Makes me wonder what you'd do if you were distributing a lifecycle-heavy tool for Linux users in general since systemd isn't ubiquitous.

    I use a systemd timer to run a monthly scrub for my btrfs pool. Kinda cool how you can do increasingly useful things like skip the next scheduled event if the user initiates a scrub, do or don't accumulate tasks if you have a monthly task but the machine was offline for 6 months -- or fold them into a single task, etc.

    • drunner 3 minutes ago
      Have you been defining them directly in your flake.nix file? I too am on nixos but I keep all my configurations in their native format and symlink them with nix, that way I can take and reuse that config on a non nixos system easily.

      The problem I have found is that nixos doesn't seem to pickup and run systemd timers and services placed into the ~/.config/systems/user folder and additionally things like WantedBy=default.target have no effect.

      So after I restart all my services manually on reboot I agree, systems timers are cool.

  • ktm5j 19 minutes ago
    Oh I love them quite a lot! I use them to run all of our backup jobs, easy to set up and have never had an issue.
  • andrewstuart 1 minute ago
    Even better is systemd socket activation.
  • jjgreen 3 hours ago
    I've been almost convinced by systemd (and have switched to using it), but God the syntax of those service files is so ugly ...
    • mrweasel 16 minutes ago
      There's definitely some weirdness to certain parts of systemd service files, but was a huge improvement over Upstart and the old SysV-style init scripts.

      Over all I think Systemd get way to much criticism. You don't have to use all the parts, but if you care to go through the documentation you'll find interesting features such as journald log-shipping and systemd-machined which can manage containers and VMs.

    • SEJeff 6 minutes ago
      Oh yes, because the well documented clean syntax of sys v init shell scripts was so nice.

      If I never recall hacking in ulimit calls in the top of buggy shell scripts for crappy old services that done respect pam_limits it won’t be soon enough.

    • zamadatix 28 minutes ago
      Never thought I'd see hackers saying INI format looked ugly of all things. It's basic, sure, but that's a good thing for something meant to be easily editable by hand from any editor. Otherwise, it's just key value pairs in named sections, how ugly can it be about that?
      • jjgreen 20 minutes ago
        key-value pairs where the = cannot be surrounded by spaces, so I have to write

          [Service]
          Type=oneshot
          WorkingDirectory={{ home }}/current/
          Environment=RAILS_ENV=production
          ExecStart=/bin/sh -lc "bin/db-backup --verbose"
        
        which fills me with sadness
    • whateveracct 31 minutes ago
      This is why I like NixOS. Defining systemd services in it is very neat.
    • WesolyKubeczek 35 minutes ago
      Could have been worse.

      Could have been YAML.

      Could have been XML.

      • silvestrov 34 minutes ago
        XML would have the advantage of having a grammar so we could validate the config files.

        It would also make it much simpler to make good GUI editors for the files instead of the Notepad approach most unix config files take.

        • Juliate 32 minutes ago
          There are good GUI editors for XML?
        • WesolyKubeczek 24 minutes ago
          Since systemd is successfully parsing its INI files, and barks at you when you put weird shit into them, a grammar for them does exist as well.

          XML is that wonderful format that gave us vulnerabilities like death by million laughs, up to a certain moment, you could MitM DTDs, and a whole slew of everything-XML stuff back when XML was like AI is today, none of which I miss today.

          Oh, and remember times when programmers would argue whether argument order in XML files should be significant or not?

          But XML books with their idealized XML future description did give me the same warm fuzzies as some intricate clockwork mechanism to a Victorian geek.

      • jjgreen 28 minutes ago
        To be honest, I think either of those would have been better ...
  • throwa356262 31 minutes ago
    GNU/Linux --> Linux/systemd
  • iso1631 34 minutes ago
    > humble systemd
  • iluvcommunism 9 minutes ago
    [dead]