The Boring Internet

(terrygodier.com)

21 points | by crowdhailer 2 hours ago

7 comments

  • pamcake 1 hour ago
    • Freak_NL 43 minutes ago
      Wait, why isn't that the article instead? Who actually wants this fade-scroll-thing? It detracts from the sensible content.
      • pratyahava 4 minutes ago
        even this "ascii" (i expected raw text but still got html+css) was hardly readable for me, had to reach to the reader view, finally readable, ohh... looks much like ai-generated, why did i spend so much time jumping over obstacles...
      • officialchicken 16 minutes ago
        CSS always counters the conceptual and philosophical use of hypertext.
    • trelbutate 1 hour ago
      Yeah, scroll fade might be useful sometimes but most of the time it's just annoying.

      https://dbushell.com/2026/01/09/death-to-scroll-fade/

      • RadiozRadioz 15 minutes ago
        What are the times in which it is useful?

        If those are referenced in the linked article, I'll be honest I didn't read it. That website succeeds whole handedly in its job of being too annoying to read.

        • cyanydeez 10 minutes ago
          im sure theres a class of people who gauge their willingness to read based on the length of scroll.
          • adrithmetiqa 1 minute ago
            I am reaching for “reader mode” in my browsers all the time as they cut through these design choices that don’t agree within my eyes

            It really helps to focus in the content rather than the fluff.

  • syhol 32 minutes ago
    Great topic and message. But the AI-generated writing really gets under my skin. It's not painful. Not unclear. Just really annoying.
    • ramon156 3 minutes ago
      Its not just a movement, it's a message.
    • donutlover 24 minutes ago
      A great little expression I heard somewhere was 'AI;DR'. I find it grating to get through a text once I've lost the trust that the author wrote it themselves. When that trust is gone, how could I be sure that these are your ideas or just something an LLM said that you happen to agree with?
    • keybored 14 minutes ago
      This is real. You are not imagining it.

      Oh sorry. I cribbed that from the article itself.

      > > This is real. You are not imagining it.

  • ianhxu 56 minutes ago
    Not sure. Without commercialization and ads, there might not be the free high-quality web apps from Google. Things have two sides. But the complexity of the internet should have far surpassed the level that even large corps could influence, and therefore, the key might be culture instead of tech.
    • ianhxu 31 minutes ago
      The ux is really bad. But the commenting, versioning, syncing functions for collaboration or cross-platform use are of high-quality. And that's actually Google vs. Apple.
    • pjerem 40 minutes ago
      > there might not be the free high-quality web apps from Google.

      I mean, which one of the "free high-quality web apps from Google" is free high quality ?

      I'm forced to use Google Workspace for work and that's an incredible pain. GMail is messy. Google Meet have an horrible UI, Google Drive is messy++, Google Chat is unusable, Google Search is unusable. The only product that is still good at google is maybe Google Maps.

  • w4yai 1 hour ago
    I find this website really hard to read, even in ASCII.
  • CM30 2 hours ago
    I mean he's right, the old internet and the technology that underlies it still exists, and there's nothing stopping you from building and using sites that work independently of the big social media platforms/centralised services.

    That said, I do wish this essay was a bit better contrast wise. Had to highlight some of the tables to read them at all, which isn't exactly ideal.

    • vanillameow 1 hour ago
      The components heavily give Claude Code vibes. I use CC to build internal tools and, given free reign over the design, this exactly what it will produce.

      Won't comment on the writing other than that the punchlines do feel a bit pretentious in an AI kinda way. I've seen the author's blog posts and I much prefer their natural writing to this essay-style output, but to each their own.

      • armchairhacker 22 minutes ago
        The writing is definitely AI.

        I see this often in HN posts and I’m not sure whether to comment. Because it seems most people don’t care; and are only discussing the title, which the LLM post is a predictable extrapolation of, so human effort on the article would be wasted.

        I wish people would discuss more interesting topics and less repeats. But probably most of the unique posts just aren’t interesting to me, and I spend too long here so I see repeats more than the average user.

    • fragmede 1 hour ago
      Somewhat. If you open port 22 up on an ip, you're going to get hit by bots scanning the Internet, trying to find an open server to ssh into. If you open port 80 or 443, you're going to get bots looking for /wp-admin.php just as soon as the domain name for it hits certificate transparency logs. The Internet's not a friendly place to be. It once was, but the default now is that someone is going to try and abuse anything you put up. Makes it hard to want to set up a new platform outside of the big centralized ones.
      • graemep 17 minutes ago
        > If you open port 22 up on an ip, you're going to get hit by bots scanning the Internet, trying to find an open server to ssh into

        This has been the case for years. I can remember this from logs for port 22, more than 20 yeas ago, I saw this.

      • tardedmeme 31 minutes ago
        Those scanners are low effort. Don't run vulnerable software and you're fine (this mostly means not running any website you didn't write, but wasn't that the point anyway?) Run it in a container and you're double-fine.

        If you don't have a wp-admin.php who cares if someone is trying to access it? If you have one but it correctly validates your admin credentials, again who cares?

        You can turn it into a fun project of making a honeypot.

      • CM30 46 minutes ago
        Eh, as someone who runs a bunch of smaller sites and forums, I've not had any issues with scammers or hackers gaining access to them. Most of them are looking for obvious vulnerabilities via some sort of script, and usually assume the file names and database structure are the same for every site they target.

        It's plenty possible to run an independent site with no issues if you keep things up to date and change a few things to thwart the most common attack attempts.

  • philipwhiuk 1 hour ago
    GPJV2kLVWR8R9AIzFcHTE

    Interesting

  • huflungdung 48 minutes ago
    [dead]