2 comments

  • yahootube 12 hours ago
    This is because of expiring patents which create an artificial inflation of businesses' durable market value for the incumbent allowing them to monopolize the market via supply scarcity. Naturally there would have been more recycling the entire time if it were not restricted by patents.
    • infecto 11 hours ago
      Which patents were the biggest hold backs in the recycling industry? I am curious how the patent landscape looks today compared to a decade ago. Seems like it would be exploding in more recent history.
    • pfdietz 12 hours ago
      Or, less conspiratorially, it's because the volume of batteries that need recycling has been steadily growing.
      • mhb 9 hours ago
        Or because the possibility of profits incentivized invention.
        • outside1234 8 hours ago
          All three of these theories can be true
          • TeMPOraL 5 hours ago
            In which case the market is working as intended.
            • Dylan16807 2 hours ago
              If all three are true then the market is 2/3 working as intended and 1/3 held back by patents that aren't being licensed out enough.
            • ezfe 5 hours ago
              Is someone saying otherwise here?
              • natpalmer1776 3 hours ago
                YahooTube’s comment is heavily implying that the market systems in-place stifled invention via patent restrictions.
      • manoDev 12 hours ago
        Both can be true.
    • halestock 4 hours ago
      Sorry what?
  • CalmBirch127 2 hours ago
    [dead]