A DIY Watch You Can Actually Wear

(hackster.io)

58 points | by sarusso 2 days ago

12 comments

  • jblezo 1 hour ago
    That's more a programmable watch than a DIY one :-)

    I build mine from scratch, including the PCB and a 3D printed case.

    For sure, that's not at all the same level of customability, programmability, capacity, nor quality. But It is really a DIY one.

    For anyone interested: https://github.com/jblezoray/hpdl1414-watch

    • Guestmodinfo 19 minutes ago
      I like your hpdl watch better than the LilyGo watch. As a lover of analog and casio watches I can tell you that your watch can soon build you a loyal following in its current form if you only build 3 such watches and put them on Amazon, etc. and price them at 50$. Next batch of 3 you could try at 100$. Don't worry about glass cover, our local watch repair guy can easily slap one in it
      • hrimfaxi 12 minutes ago
        The HPDL-1414 appears to be discontinued though still available from some suppliers in varying MOQs and leads.
  • inasio 6 minutes ago
    Does anyone know if this has an accelerometer? I recently got a nice sports-oriented smartwatch (non-Garmin), to use it mostly for rowing, but it doesn't track the rowing-rate. It should be pretty easy to program one if the watch has accelerometers, but couldn't tell from the spec sheet (maybe that means no?)
  • MrDrMcCoy 13 minutes ago
    There are only a few features I care about in a smartwatch:

    1. O2 monitoring. I have sleep apnea and live at high altitude, so this matters to me.

    2. Motion sensor. Also mostly for tracking sleep.

    3. Vibrator for notifications.

    4. A screen backlight.

    5. Battery life longer than a week.

    6. Waterproof enough to survive a splash in the shower/rain.

    I consider GPS, cellular, AI, touchscreens, cloud-only sync and control apps, and just about everything else to be anti-features. There are no devices that really cover all this that I've found. A few Garmin and Amazfit/Zepp devices come close, but they have enough drawbacks for me to not be happy with them. The new Pebble is nearly perfect, but the lack of an O2 sensor is a dealbreaker for me :(

  • oritron 33 minutes ago
    I like a good smart watch and I appreciate open source, but an ESP32 isn't a great pick when low power consumption is important and the device is going to be communicating regularly. I'm surprised LILYGO went that direction in a watch form factor.
    • hrimfaxi 11 minutes ago
      Most of their lora devices are ESP32.
    • smlacy 19 minutes ago
      What would you suggest instead?
  • briandw 14 minutes ago
    No mention of battery life? I guess it depends on the software that you run. But it would be nice to have a benchmark for how long it would last in normal watch mode.
  • Retr0id 1 hour ago
    It's cool that the firmware is hackable but I think "DIY" is an imprecise way to describe that.
  • gitowiec 43 minutes ago
    This device looks capable of a lot of features and possibilities. Unfortunately nothing comes to my mind because I'm not good with diy hardware (once connected raspberry pi zero with led strips). Could someone tell examples of interesting and/or useful projects one can implement with this watch?
  • HardwareLust 2 days ago
    LILYGO site shows pre-orders of all 3 versions are sold out unfortunately.
  • jwr 55 minutes ago
    This does look very cool. Every peripheral one could think of, even LoRA!
    • hrimfaxi 10 minutes ago
      That stood out to me, too. Garmin should take a hint.
  • gamerslexus 1 hour ago
    s/Watch/Smartwatch

    Regular DYI watches aren't big news...

    (I would be over the moon for a DIY smartwatch with zero AI and e-ink screen.)

    • stackghost 1 hour ago
      I would consider a DIY mechanical/analog watch to be far bigger news/more impressive than a smartwatch.
      • bloggie 1 hour ago
        To be honest there is not much to it, you buy the movement, put it in a case, and put the hands on it. you can get everything from aliexpress. it's easier and often cheaper to just buy a normal watch if you need one.
        • Avicebron 58 minutes ago
          It's impressive you start with a lathe and make the movement yourself!
        • NooneAtAll3 1 hour ago
          buying movement is like buying whole PCB

          DIY analogy would probably be about acquiring individual gears

          • gamerslexus 53 minutes ago
            Is it different with a smartwatch? You buy the kit, it's not like you solder much as far as I understand.
      • gamerslexus 55 minutes ago
        I thought so too, but after quick research apparently there are kits. For various values of "DIY", I guess...
        • stackghost 46 minutes ago
          Sure but buying a movement kit is no different than buying a pcb. Writing code is not impressive any more.
  • ImPostingOnHN 28 minutes ago
    Preorders sold out already!
  • ck2 1 hour ago
    have wished for decades now there was an open-source Garmin on the level of Cyanogenmod / LineageOS for Android

    not sure if it will happen this decade but definitely next decade

    proper running/cycling metrics are hard as demonstrated by how many well-funded competitors are somewhat close but not there 100% yet (Coros, Amazfit, etc)

    someone once hacked and decompiled older Garmins but newer ones are encrypted/signed/locked-down

    • m463 34 minutes ago
      > newer ones are encrypted/signed/locked-down

      I have a garmin watch and didn't know this.

      That said, I just used it out of the box, and never (on purpose) hooked it to wifi, bluetooth, garmin connect, etc. Can't do that with an apple watch.

    • rjsw 1 hour ago
      Have you looked at the specs for the upcoming PineTime Pro [1]?

      [1] https://pine64.org/2026/03/28/pinetime_march_2026/

      • xrd 26 minutes ago
        I'm very excited about this. GPS was the final piece of the puzzle.

        I love(d) my bangle.js. Such a true hacker device. Really fun to use WebUSB and push JavaScript files as apps.

        But the GPS on that device was a mess, honestly. I know this is a complicated problem but having to synchronize to satellites and recalibrate all the time was beyond me.

        I really wanted it to work because I built my own toy run tracker visualization tool.

        I am curious about this new lilygo device because it sounds like it has an alternative location sensor: "A u-blox MIA-M10Q GNSS module provides accurate location tracking..."

        I'll need to look that up. Anyone have a summary on what's the difference between that and regular GPS?

    • mghackerlady 1 hour ago
      I have a garmin from the late 90s and am saddened by the lack of FOSS software to even sync a new map onto it
      • ck2 1 hour ago
        not sure if this will help you but there is a neat website that allows you to build free maps for older Garmin models that didn't have them at first like Fenix5

        https://garmin.bbbike.org/

        1990s is going way back though, they didn't even have mass-storage mode then, it was their proprietary "garmin mode" for usb which only things like BaseCamp can talk to