> Lilypond is a very good tool, but the part on Gregorian chant is not maintained and very deep modifications would be needed to perfectly align the notes and text.
> Note, however, that there are some serious flaws in
LilyPond regarding Gregorian notation (especially the non-modern
version), and right now there is nobody who works on improving that...
I may be one of the few HN users for whom this is an extremely useful resource. I’m an Anglican priest, so I’m often scanning and pasting bits and pieces of chant into our bulletins. This will, I hope, allow me to create much cleaner looking chant texts in the future! Thank you for sharing it!
I am probably one of the few people here that used this ‘in anger’. Around 15 years ago I would typeset orders of service in tex for our college chapel, and enjoyed typesetting the chant - this tool made it really easy and I could produce IMO beautiful documents.
Most of the time people used bitmaps which would be blurred/pixelated or not resize well
[1]: https://www.sourceandsummit.com/editor/alpha/
I checked, and lilypond also offers features for Gregorian chant notation [1]. Has anyone used both and is able to compare?
[1] https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/notation/typese...
> Lilypond is a very good tool, but the part on Gregorian chant is not maintained and very deep modifications would be needed to perfectly align the notes and text.
Source: https://gregorio-project.github.io/gregoriotex/index.html
> Note, however, that there are some serious flaws in LilyPond regarding Gregorian notation (especially the non-modern version), and right now there is nobody who works on improving that...
1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2024-10/msg...
You might be interested in an online editor [1] for small items. (I haven't used it much, but it seems good.)
[1]: https://www.sourceandsummit.com/editor/alpha/
Most of the time people used bitmaps which would be blurred/pixelated or not resize well
Your chapel was very fortunate.