Show HN: Made a little Artemis II tracker

(artemis-ii-tracker.com)

49 points | by codingmoh 3 hours ago

14 comments

  • 0x38B 1 hour ago
    It says the distance from Earth right now is 154,000km, but the other trackers, including NASA, say 30,000km (numbers rounded). The velocity is different as well, 7km/s vs NASA's 4km/s.
  • p1mrx 28 minutes ago
    Here's the official one, presumably with correct data: https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artemis-ii/arow/
    • rkagerer 1 minute ago
      Sadly I just see an empty progress bar?
  • dvt 2 hours ago
    To me, what's super interesting about this is the fact that my brain instantly recognized it's AI coded (not sure why, it might be the spacing, the font, the text glow, etc.).
    • YCprince 2 hours ago
      The First thought that came to mind was It's AI coded. Maybe it's because they follow a similar design pattern. Or maybe we have some supernatural powers
    • noman-land 31 minutes ago
      Claude always makes sites look this way.
    • rickracconai 2 hours ago
      [dead]
  • rozab 1 hour ago
    This has always been a peeve of mine, but the lack of scale diagrams in coverage of this is maddening. We know what the Earth and the Moon look like, there is no need to make them 20 times bigger. Surely the point of these diagrams is to show the unbelievable scale of the journey. I'm yet to see one this news cycle, from NASA or anyone else
    • zamadatix 10 minutes ago
      In defense of the given approach:

      False scale gives a direct way to see which body is which and where the craft is between them without having to work it out backwards from the rest of the context (while real scale makes both sides just looks like dots on typical sized screens and you need to know/read the rest before you can figure out which is which otherwise).

      Combine that with "the scale of the Earth is already too large to comprehend accurately anyways" and defaulting to real scale doesn't really add as much as one might think to the experience anyways.

    • groggo 51 minutes ago
      Someone should make a website or project and post it on HN, and then set up an AI agent takes the top comments and just implements them.
  • Polizeiposaune 25 minutes ago
    The closest they get to the moon is about 8000km/5000 miles above the surface over the far side

    The trajectory depicted has them hitting the moon; it should instead show them passing 2+ lunar diameters behind the moon.

  • Gagarin1917 1 hour ago
    I don’t think the current position of Orion is accurate. It shows them about halfway to the moon, but they’re just leaving Earth orbit right now.
  • O1111OOO 1 hour ago
    A few more trackers:

    https://artemistracker.com/

    https://artemislivetracker.com/

    https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artemis-ii/arow/

    Aside... so impressed with the UI on the posted version.

  • dap 1 hour ago
    Is the MET right? They launched about 29 hours ago but it says 1d18h
  • washbasin 2 hours ago
    This is cool! NASA uses Imperial units (well, unless the it's the Mars Climate Orbiter). Can we get a version that follows the units they are using with their public feeds?
  • GrifMD 2 hours ago
    This is cool! I do want to ask, did you have AI design the page for you? It looks like a design pattern I've seen spit out by LLMs pretty frequently.

    I'm not hear to talk down to you about the site, I love this little thing that gives me just enough info to satisfy my curiosity.

    • zamadatix 0 minutes ago
      I'll be the guy that talks down about Show HN becoming a place to post the thing you just vibe coded then because they didn't even bother to check the accuracy of the result - the numbers it provides about the mission are waaay off right now.

      I'm not necessarily against people sharing AI generated projects but there almost needs to be an [AI] tag if they do because it's really crashing the excitement of seeing a Show HN post where the assumption is this is something someone has been working hard and is proud to show it off rather than something they just got out of Claude yesterday or whatever.

  • arnav7717 2 hours ago
    very cool! How did you get the data?
  • jamesbfb 2 hours ago
    Bless! Absolutely love this, and an absolutely no disrespect, this is vibe code goodness! These are the kinds of things I have an absolute ball building, usually when I’m sitting on the couch at the end of the day duel screening.

    What’s the data source? Assuming NASA being NASA they have a public API for the mission?

  • OOHehir 1 hour ago
    Nice job
  • Smoosh 3 hours ago
    Nice, thanks.