A persistent issue I have with Cursor et al. is that they hallucinate function arguments when using a function or method from a library. It seems like automatically pulling the library's documentation into the context would be helpful, but I haven't found any tool that does this automatically. Is there any chance that Runner does this?
It doesn't seem like this was the problem you were trying to solve, but reliable use of libraries and APIs is a critical problem to solve if you want LLM-generated code to work.
I agree that's a major problem. It's not something I've solved yet. I suspect a web research sub-agent is likely what's needed, so it can pull in up-to-date docs for whatever library you need to work with.
Gemini is required for the context management sub-agent. You can use any of OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini for the main planning and coding agents, but GPT-5 performs the best in my experience. Claude 4 Sonnet works well too, but it's about twice as expensive.
A persistent issue I have with Cursor et al. is that they hallucinate function arguments when using a function or method from a library. It seems like automatically pulling the library's documentation into the context would be helpful, but I haven't found any tool that does this automatically. Is there any chance that Runner does this?
It doesn't seem like this was the problem you were trying to solve, but reliable use of libraries and APIs is a critical problem to solve if you want LLM-generated code to work.
Could you explain why both / why not also Claude (why not all three?)